Snow Jensen & Reece, P.C.

Legal Experience and Local Roots

Offering professional legal services to individuals and businesses since 1986.

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA): Rights And Protections For Consumers

A visual representation of Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) violations.

In 2026, American Collectors Association (ACA) International noted that household debt in the United States had reached $18.8 trillion. Credit card debt increased by $44 billion over the previous year, and the aggregate delinquency rate reached 4.8 percent. Student loan debt is also becoming a major issue, with almost 10 percent of debtors now more than 90 days delinquent. Debt collection agencies and creditors are facing higher levels of urgency when attempting to recover losses, and this may cause some to violate the rights of consumers. These rights and protections are outlined by the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), a federal law that can help reduce unnecessary stress and pressure. 

Those who are wondering whether their rights under the FDCPA have been violated by creditors may contact experienced bankruptcy or business litigation attorneys in Utah. Snow Jensen & Reece, P.C. has a strong connection with its local community, and it has been assisting residents since 1986. Keep this conversation going by contacting Snow Jensen & Reece, P.C. at (435) 628-3688. We serve residents of Cedar City and St. George. 

The FCPA Protects You From Predatory Debt Collectors

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act dates back to 1977, and its purpose is to protect consumers against unfair, abusive, or deceptive debt collection practices. According to Congress, the FDCPA bans any lies or deceit during debt collection practices. This law also bans unreasonable fees, harassment, abuse, inconvenient communication, and certain types of lawsuits. Under the FDCPA, a consumer can request that a debt collector stop contacting them. Most of the time, these requests must be honored by the debt collector. In certain situations, creditors can sue debt collectors for FDCPA violations. This federal law does not override state regulations against unfair debt collection practices, and Utah is free to enforce its own set of protections. 

Summary of FDCPA Protections, Debt Collection in Utah, and Business Law

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) is a federal law that protects consumers from unfair, deceptive, and abusive debt collection practices, including harassment, misleading statements, and inconvenient communication. 

  • The FDCPA allows consumers to request that debt collectors stop contacting them through a written cease and desist letter, although the debt itself may still be pursued through legal channels. 
  • Debt collectors cannot falsely claim to represent law enforcement or attorneys, and they generally cannot contact consumers before 8:00 AM, after 9:00 PM, or at inconvenient times such as during work shifts.
  • Utah consumers may also have protections under the Utah Consumer Sales Practices Act (UCSPA), which can apply to original creditors and certain unconscionable collection practices not specifically addressed by the FDCPA. 

Snow Jensen & Reece, P.C. assists individuals in Cedar City, St. George, and surrounding Utah communities with matters involving debt collection disputes, consumer protections, bankruptcy concerns, and related business litigation issues.

Does the FDCPA Allow Me to Stop Debt Collection Calls?

The FDCPA allows debtors to stop all debt collection calls, emails, and other forms of contact. A consumer can simply file a “cease and desist” letter in writing to the debt collection agency. While a verbal request is still valid, a written letter is more likely to be enforceable under federal law. Once a debt collection agency receives this request, it must immediately stop contacting the debtor about the unpaid sum. The cease and desist letter does not delete the debt, and the collection agency can continue to pursue it through other means. This includes lawsuits, and some debtors might actually prefer to remain in communication with debt collection agencies to remain updated about the status of their situation. 

The FDCPA Bans Deceit and Misleading Statements

One of the most important protections offered by the FDCPA involves a ban against misleading statements and general deceit. A debt collector cannot falsely claim to be someone else when contacting a debtor. For example, a debt collector cannot claim to be associated with law enforcement. Another common issue is a debt collector who attempts to impersonate a licensed lawyer. When a debt collector utilizes these illegal tactics, the goal is usually to intimidate the debtor. The false possibility of an arrest or lawsuit can cause considerable stress for a debtor, and this is completely against the law in Utah. 

A Debt Collector Cannot Contact You at Odd Hours

Another important aspect of the FDCPA is a provision that prevents debt collectors from calling consumers at odd, inconvenient hours. Generally speaking, debt collectors cannot call consumers early in the morning (before 8:00 AM) or late at night (after 9:00 PM). A debt collector may also be prohibited from calling a consumer while they are at work. For example, a debt collector might call a worker in the middle of their shift at 3:00 PM. If the worker tells the debt collector that these calls at work are inconvenient, then the debt collector must stop calling at this time. Aside from phone calls, these restrictions may apply to text messages or emails. 

Does Utah Have Its Own Debt Collection Laws?

The closest equivalent to the FDCPA under Utah state law is the Utah Consumer Sales Practices Act (UCSPA). This law does not apply specifically to debt collection, and it instead regulates all business practices in the state. However, aspects of the UCSPA make certain types of debt collection practices illegal. In some situations, the UCSPA applies in situations that the FDCPA fails to cover, thereby covering “gaps” left by federal law. Perhaps most importantly, the FDCPA applies only to debt collection agencies (third parties) and not original creditors. In contrast, the UCSPA covers original creditors. The Utah statute also bans all “unconscionable” debt collection practices, and not just the prohibited actions outlined by the FDCPA. 

Can I Sue a Debt Collector for Violating the FDCPA?

A debtor can sue a creditor or debt collector for violating the FDCPA. If successful, this type of lawsuit can provide a relatively small award in statutory damages. A debtor can also recover lost compensation. For example, a debtor might have been forced to miss hours of work because a creditor called them during inconvenient hours. A debtor who wins this type of lawsuit also does not have to pay any attorney fees, as this responsibility falls on the shoulders of the creditor. 

Learn More About the FDCPA With Snow Jensen & Reece, P.C. 

Although online research can help consumers learn more about their rights and privileges, a direct consultation with a business litigation attorney in Utah could provide more targeted information. Aside from the FDCPA, there may be other laws and protections worth considering when facing creditors and debt collection agencies. With help from an experienced attorney, it may be possible to sue creditors and related parties for violating the FDCPA. This not only sends a clear message to debt collectors, but it can also provide consumers with compensation for various damages (including attorney fees). A continued conversation with Snow Jensen & Reece, P.C. could lead to further insights. Residents of central and southern Utah may contact us at (435) 628-3688. 

Common FAQs About Business Law and the FDCPA

The following frequently asked questions address common issues and confusions surrounding the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and its business implications. 

What Is the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act?

The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act is a federal law enacted in 1977 to regulate the conduct of debt collectors. The law prohibits harassment, deception, abusive communication practices, unreasonable fees, and other unfair tactics used during debt collection efforts.

Who Does the FDCPA Apply To?

The FDCPA generally applies to third-party debt collection agencies and individuals attempting to collect debts on behalf of another party. In many situations, the law does not apply directly to original creditors collecting their own debts, although state laws may provide additional protections.

Can Consumers Stop Debt Collection Calls and Messages?

Consumers may request that debt collectors stop contacting them by sending a written cease and desist letter. After receiving the request, the debt collector must generally stop communications related to the debt, although legal actions to recover the debt may still continue.

What Types of Conduct Are Prohibited Under the FDCPA?

The FDCPA prohibits debt collectors from making false statements, impersonating attorneys or law enforcement officials, threatening unlawful actions, or engaging in harassment. The law also restricts repeated phone calls, abusive language, and misleading representations about the amount or status of a debt.

When Can Debt Collectors Contact Consumers?

Debt collectors generally cannot contact consumers before 8:00 AM or after 9:00 PM unless permission has been provided. If a consumer informs the debt collector that workplace communications are inconvenient, the collector must typically stop contacting the individual at work.

Does Utah Have Additional Debt Collection Laws?

Utah consumers may have protections under the Utah Consumer Sales Practices Act. Unlike the FDCPA, the Utah statute may apply to original creditors and certain unconscionable business practices that fall outside the scope of federal debt collection laws.

Can a Consumer Sue a Debt Collector for FDCPA Violations?

A consumer may have the ability to file a lawsuit against a debt collector for violating the FDCPA. Depending on the circumstances, available remedies could include statutory damages, recovery for financial losses, and payment of attorney fees by the violating party.

Scroll to Top